Buying Power Index Class of 2010

How much buying power did starting salaries offer?

The relative buying power of the dollar in any two cities is very important when comparing the nominal dollar amounts of the salaries in those two cities. Those interested in this topic might, for example, ask about the "buying power" of a salary of $160,000 in Boston compared to a similar nominal salary in San Francisco. The question becomes, "Which location offers the most buying power?" The answer, and the dollars that accompany it, often translates into discretionary income and lifestyle options for new attorneys.

To illustrate purchasing power differentials, cities are ranked on the basis of a Buying Power Index (BPI). The BPI was calculated using New York City's median reported private practice salary for the Class of 2010 and cost of living as the benchmark. New York City's BPI is thus 1.00. BPI's for other cities show how much buying power the median reported law firm salary for the Class of 2010 in that city provides compared with the New York City median. The table below shows the BPI calculated for 70 cities for which at least 15 law firm salaries were reported for the Class of 2010 and for which cost-of living information was available. It is evident that the buying power of the median salary in more than half of the cities listed exceeds that of New York's when relative costs of living are factored in. For example, the median reported law firm salary in Cleveland, Detroit, and Phoenix is about two-thirds that of New York's, but nonetheless each offers about one-third more buying power than does the New York salary. Likewise, the buying power of the median reported salary in Baltimore almost matches that of New York's even though the median salary is just over half that of New York.

The difference in purchasing power between $160,000 in San Francisco and $160,000 in Boston can be determined. The BPI in San Francisco is 1.321; that in Boston is 1.634. This means that the Boston salary offers about 24% more purchasing power than the identical salary in San Francisco [1.634/1.321] = 1.24 or 24%. Or, viewed the other way around, the San Francisco salary offered about 81% of the purchasing power of the Boston salary [1.321/1.634] x 100 = 80.8%. Salaries in any two cities with similar salaries but different BPI's may be compared in this manner.

Likewise, the BPI can be used to compare any salary in a listed city (not just the median) with that for New York because the salary required to provide the same purchasing power as the $160,000 New York salary does not change. For example, in Atlanta, that figure is about $70,610. If the actual salary obtained in Atlanta is $100,000, it will purchase about 40% more than the $160,000 salary in New York [$100,000/$70,610] = 1.42 or 32%.

Median Reported Private Practice Salaries in Selected Cities Ranked by Buying Power of the Salary — Class of 2010

City Reported Median Salary Salary Required to Yield New York City Buying Power* Buying Power Index
Dallas, TX$150,000$67,8702.210
Houston, TX135,00068,1001.982
Atlanta, GA135,00070,6101.912
Chicago, IL145,00086,3601.679
Boston, MA160,00097,8901.634
Los Angeles, CA160,000100,7001.589
Birmingham, AL105,00067,1351.564
Washington, DC160,000103,4401.547
St. Louis, MO100,00066,8401.496
Newport Beach, CA160,000108,1001.480
Newark, NJ135,00095,8201.409
Menlo Park, CA160,000115,3401.387
Mountain View, CA160,000115,3401.387
Palo Alto, CA160,000115,3401.387
Kansas City, MO100,00072,2401.384
Denver, CO105,00076,2301.377
Phoenix, AZ102,00074,3801.371
Nashville, TN90,00065,7301.369
Detroit, MI100,00073,4201.362
Cleveland, OH100,00074,6801.339
Philadelphia, PA125,00093,4601.337
Austin, TX93,50070,6101.324
San Francisco, CA160,000121,1101.321
Minneapolis, MN108,00082,0001.317
Jackson, MS93,75071,6451.308
Irvine, CA140,000108,1001.295
Salt Lake City, UT95,00074,3801.277
New Orleans, LA90,00071,6451.256
Charlotte, NC82,50068,9101.197
Milwaukee, WI90,00075,1901.197
Rochester, NY88,00073,8601.191
Omaha, NE77,00065,2101.181
Fort Worth, TX79,00067,2801.174
Seattle, WA105,00089,6101.172
Pittsburgh, PA78,00067,6501.153
Miami, FL85,00078,3701.085
Memphis, TN70,00065,2101.073
Las Vegas, NV80,00075,2701.063
San Antonio, TX75,00070,6801.061
Columbus, OH72,00067,9501.060
Charleston, WV72,00068,4701.052
New York, NY160,000160,0001.000
Baltimore, MD87,00088,2100.986
Alexandria, VA100,000103,4400.967
Cincinnati, OH65,00069,3500.937
Raleigh, NC67,75072,5300.934
Hartford, CT83,00089,9800.922
San Diego, CA90,00097,6700.921
Dayton, OH62,00067,5800.917
Des Moines, IA60,00067,2100.893
Louisville, KY57,50064,7700.888
Tulsa, OK57,50065,3600.880
Tampa, FL60,00068,3180.878
Columbia, SC65,00074,1600.876
Sacramento, CA75,00085,8400.874
Albuquerque, NM60,00070,240 0.854
Oakland, CA87,500102,7000.852
Buffalo, NY60,00070,7600.848
Richmond, VA65,00077,1900.842
Portland, OR67,00082,2200.815
Jacksonville, FL55,00068,6900.801
Orlando, FL57,50072,2400.796
Baton Rouge, LA54,50070,9800.768
Little Rock, AR54,00071,2750.753
Oklahoma City, OK50,00067,8000.737
Fort Lauderdale, FL62,00085,4700.725
Long Beach, CA72,000100,7000.715
Southfield, MI51,25073,4900.697
San Jose, CA80,000115,3400.694
Charleston, SC50,00072,6100.689
Albany, NY50,00079,8500.626

*For ease of presentation, these figures have been rounded to the nearest $10.

Notes on Resources and Methodology for Calculating the Buying Power Index

The Buying Power Index (BPI) uses as its benchmark New York City's median starting salary and cost of living. Cost of living information was obtained from The Council for Community & Economic Research (C2ER) and its ACCRA Cost of Living Index for 2010. C2ER is a nonprofit professional organization of research staff of chambers of commerce, economic development organizations, and related organizations. C2ER obtains information through the participation of local Chambers of Commerce. C2ER uses this information to develop a cost of living index relative to a U.S. average of 100. The index measures differences in the costs of goods and services; C2ER does not attempt to incorporate tax differentials into its index. The index is not available for metropolitan areas whose Chamber(s) of Commerce do not participate.

These indices were used to create an adjusted cost of living index for each city, with New York City, rather than the U.S. average, set as 1.00. This adjusted index thus indicates the dollar amount equivalent to a dollar in New York when the cost of living differential is considered. For example, the ACCRA Cost of Living index for the Pittsburgh, PA area is 91.5 Comparing this to New York's index of 216.4 means that $0.43 is needed in Pittsburgh to obtain purchasing power equal to that of $1.00 in New York (91.5/216.4 = 0.4228).

This adjusted index was then used to determine how the New York median private practice salary would have to be scaled to provide comparable purchasing power in each city. Using the Pittsburgh example, the lower cost of living means that a salary of $67,650 is equivalent in purchasing power terms to the $160,000 salary in New York ($160,000 x 0.4228 = $67,650).

This purchasing power equivalent was then compared to the actual median reported private practice salary in each city to determine a BPI. The closer the BPI is to 1.00, the closer the salary comes to providing purchasing power on a parity with New York City. Continuing with the Pittsburgh example, the BPI is 1.153 ($78,000/$67,650), meaning that the salary has about 15% more purchasing power than the New York salary. However, a comparable $80,000 median salary reported for San Jose, CA, provides just 70% of the purchasing power of New York's median because the cost of living is higher in San Jose compared with Pittsburgh, though still lower than that of New York. Other cities where the reported median does not provide the purchasing power of the New York salary include Jacksonville, FL and Albany, NY. In contrast, the purchasing power in every city with a reported median of at least $90,000, with the exception of San Diego, exceeds that of New York.

National Association for Law Placement, Inc.® (NALP®)
1220 19th Street NW, Suite 510, Washington, DC 20036-2405
(202) 835-1001 [email protected]
© Copyright 2024 NALP


View Full Site